..........................................NEXT PREVIOUS INDEX
L02 CPG: Complex sentences - participle 'te_hue' Participle 'te_hue' o Ex.: shikArI ne bhAgate hue shera ko dekhA hunter -erg running lion acc. saw (The hunter saw a running lion.) OR (The hunter while running saw a lion.) - Sentence is ambiguous: + 'running' modifies 'lion', OR + 'running' modifies 'saw' - Two different TAMs: + 'tA_huA' modifies a noun + 'te_hue' modifies a verb However, oblique form of former TAM becomes 'te_hue', which becomes ambiguous. Discussed in detail below. + Ex.1: shikArI ne bhAgatA huA shera dekhA hunter -erg runn -ing lion saw (The hunter saw a running lion.) dekha[tA_hE] | | .----------. |k1 |k2 | | shikArI shera | | |k1-INV | bhaga[tA_huA] - Demand chart for tA_huA: * This together with karaka chart etc. produces m-m tree above. + Ex. 2: shikArI ne bhAgate hue shera ko dekhA hunter -erg run -ing lion acc. saw (The hunter while running saw a lion.) dekha[tA_hE] | | .----------------. |k1 |k2 |simult. | | | shikArI shera bhaga[tA_huA] - Demand chart for te_hue [tA_huA] arc-lable manda. vibh. lex-type agreement-holds simult. m - (v) agr * This together with karaka chart etc. produces m-m tree above. - Karaka sharing rule for v[te_hue] If k1(v) = 0 then k1(v) = k1(parent (v)) * Applying above rule k1(bhAga) = k1(dekha) = shikArI * Note: 'shikArI' is karta of 'bhaga' not directly but indirectly through sharing rule. ('bhAga' does not modify 'shikArI' directly.)..........................................NEXT PREVIOUS INDEX